It should come as no surprise (I hope) that I have rather
strong feelings about people feeling they are better than others. I also realize, in many ways, I may come
across as a hypocrite saying that. After
all, don’t I word my rants from a “place of authority” I am not necessarily
entitled to? On the other hand, things
annoy me and I have to talk about them somewhere, so you poor wretches get to
deal with it.
Just recently, I read an opinion going roughly thus: “I hate it so much when people play Skyrim
because it’s popular without playing all of Bethesda’s other games”.
Well… That’s nice. (There’s a great joke about someone who
went to finishing school and learned to say “That’s nice” instead of “Fuck you”. Keep this in mind.)
I realize this is opinion but it goes into a lot of what I
see in hardcore gaming culture in general, and it just twigged me off. Now personally, I own Morrowind and Oblivion,
and haven’t gotten through them, but I still want to try Skyrim because it sounds
like a good game. I also tend more
toward indie games, the not big budget games, because that is the market I want
to go into, and more importantly, I’m cheap.
I don’t see the point of many of the more popular games (Call of Duty
and Battlefield, I’m looking at you), but I won’t deride a person for playing
them. … Okay, I will deride a person
for playing them, if they complain they have no time for their homework because
they were too busy playing the game all weekend, but that is less about the
game and more about the time management skills.
Anyway, I have rather digressed.
Gaming is no longer this walled garden, and it feels like a
lot of people feel it still is. For
better or for worse, it is a far more generalized hobby now, with all that
implies. It’s not just the hobby of
nerds. … I feel it necessary to say I am
a nerd, and have no shame in this fact.
Anyway, where I was going:
Gaming attracts all sorts of people.
This means that not everybody has played all the games you have. Not everybody likes the games you like. And yes, people play games because they are
popular. My question for all the
elitists out there is this:
Why do you care?
I’m serious. Why do
you care? What harm is happening to you
because a person does not play all the games you wish them to? There are many reasons they might not but is
it really anybody’s business? Now there
is something for bashing games they’ve never played and know next to nothing
about (or because they are popular. I
deal with those a lot.) But what
business is it to the Society of Purity in Gaming Busybodies just what other
people play?
What it comes down to is this, in my mind: What matters in games is that people have
fun. Preferably, that fun comes without
exploiting people in the games. For all
I say that games don’t matter, they do matter for how they take such a large
role in peoples lives.
But for those purists who insist that everybody like the
same things they like, everybody play the same things they play, everybody
looking for the idea that gaming is a huge monoculture based around their
wants?
Go Eat a Bag of Cacti.
Raw. And pointy.
So yeah. I just…
elitists in all respects annoy me, for all I talk on a really high horse myself
(That phrase makes me think of a horse that somebody gave a great deal of pot
to…). While I think games are important
to the future, for educating and getting through to people… The most important
factor is fun. People tell me the most
important parts are story, plot, characters, gameplay… but the most important
part is fun, and people trying to take that from others in the name of feeling
superior, or because they feel they are part of some walled garden that no
longer exists bugs the hell out of me.
Speaking of walled gardens, watch this space for a rant
about portrayals of various people in games (As I am a fat female, guess my
nitpick of choice! However this extends
over a lot of things), narrow perceived audiences, and worldwide monocultures
in fantasy settings, because dear lord that is creepy.
No comments:
Post a Comment